Cable Gland manufacturer profile

WISKA Hoppmann GmbH

WISKA Hoppmann GmbH is a cable gland manufacturer based in Kaltenkirchen, Germany. [S2][S1]

Country
Germany [S1]
City
Kaltenkirchen [S2]
Website
wiska.com

Procurement snapshot

Only hard product-level facts retained from the cited source route are shown below. A missing buying field is handled separately, rather than estimated from the listed series.

Material options
Polyamide, brass and stainless-steel versions with identical clamping ranges. [S4]
Entry options
IP68/IP69 requirements, PG/metric/NPT threads and optional EMC inserts. [S5]
SPRINT
Official product image [S6]

Evidence scope

The retained official product route documents: WISKA documents SPRINT as a cable-gland system. This dossier uses that cited route as the editorial scope. [S7]

The retained research coverage separates company identity from the named product evidence. It does not turn one model or series into a claim about unlisted company-wide operations. [S9]

Cable Gland

Documented series: SPRINT cable-gland system.

WISKA documents SPRINT as a cable-gland system. [S7]

Documented specifications for Cable Gland
Materialstainless steel [S10]
StandardDIN EN 45545 [S11]
Material options
Polyamide, brass and stainless-steel versions with identical clamping ranges. [S4]
Entry options
IP68/IP69 requirements, PG/metric/NPT threads and optional EMC inserts. [S5]
  • SPRINT cable-gland system. [S6]

Selection fit: Compare SPRINT where its cited material choices, thread format and optional EMC insert fit; confirm the specific version and installation requirement with WISKA. [S8]

Product range and documented series

WISKA documents SPRINT as a cable-gland system. [S7]

  • SPRINT cable-gland system. [S6]Source note: SPRINT

Procurement fit

Sourcing guidance for the SPRINT system centres on confirming that the selected variant matches the application's material, sealing, and electromagnetic compatibility requirements. The same clamping range is available across polyamide, brass, and stainless-steel versions, allowing substitution on mechanical fit rather than size. PG, metric, and NPT thread formats are listed, and EMC inserts are available as an option. Final version selection and installation parameters must be confirmed directly with WISKA.

Technical capabilities

The SPRINT cable-gland system is documented with an ingress protection rating of IP68 and is referenced for applications meeting IP68/IP69 requirements. Three material variants are listed: polyamide, brass, and stainless steel, each with identical clamping ranges. Thread formats include PG, metric, and NPT. Optional EMC inserts are noted for installations requiring electromagnetic compatibility considerations. All ratings and material options are taken directly from the supplied product reference; no further performance data is publicly documented.

Markets and applications

The supplied documentation does not specify target industries, sectors, or application environments for the SPRINT cable-gland system. Suitability is implied only by the IP68 ingress protection rating, the inclusion of stainless-steel material for corrosive or hygienic environments, and the availability of EMC inserts for electrically sensitive installations. Specific market segments, reference projects, and application case studies are not publicly documented in the available reference material.

Evidence limitations

The following procurement and engineering fields are not publicly documented in the supplied reference: operating temperature range, torque values, cable diameter range beyond clamping range notation, certification marks, approvals, country of origin statements beyond Germany, manufacturing location specifics, and warranty terms. Buyer-specific fields such as lead time, minimum order quantity, and distributor network are not publicly documented. Confirmation of the exact version and installation requirement with WISKA is advised.

Editorial summary

WISKA Hoppmann GmbH, headquartered in Kaltenkirchen, Germany, is documented in this directory under the cable gland category. The referenced product line is the SPRINT cable-gland system. Publicly listed attributes are limited to material composition, ingress protection rating, thread format, and available insert options. No additional product families, certifications, or manufacturing details are recorded in the supplied documentation. Specifications should be verified against the manufacturer's current technical datasheet before procurement or engineering use.

Compiled prose, not a quotation. It restates facts drawn from the cited rows above and adds none of its own. It is not itself a sourced record, so read the cited sections for the authoritative wording.

Not published in retained sources

These common buyer fields were explicitly outside the retained source coverage for this dossier. They are shown as omissions, not filled with a proxy, a related model or an assumption.

Research coverage

Evidence states describe the public material reviewed for this profile; they do not rate the company or assert an undisclosed fact.

  • WISKA corporate context is retained from its imprint. SPRINT facts and visual are limited to the cited series; no single material, SKU certification, company sales or delivery claim is asserted. [S9]Company-stated

Frequently asked questions

What Cable Gland product is documented for WISKA Hoppmann GmbH?

The retained product material names SPRINT cable-gland system. The dossier keeps this as a product-level statement rather than using it as a claim about the company's entire catalogue. [S6]

Which published material options should a buyer compare?

The cited product material records: Polyamide, brass and stainless-steel versions with identical clamping ranges. Use the value as a product-level comparison point, while keeping the exact model and installation boundaries in the cited route. [S4]

Which published entry options should a buyer compare?

The cited product material records: IP68/IP69 requirements, PG/metric/NPT threads and optional EMC inserts. Use the value as a product-level comparison point, while keeping the exact model and installation boundaries in the cited route. [S5]

Which common buying fields are not published in the retained sources?

The retained source packet does not publish Annual sales, Certifications. Those fields are intentionally left out of the procurement snapshot rather than inferred from a related series, a product image or the company identity. [S9]

Research notes

The retained first-party packet supports a richer product-level reading surface, but it does not yet contain 600 words of distinct cited content. This noindex dossier remains in reviewing status until additional source-backed facts are retained.