REQUEST FOR QUOTE → Request a quote
SpecForge Editorial Team

A2 vs BW vs CW vs E1W Cable Glands: Spec-Driven Selection Map

Table of Contents
  1. A2 / A1: The unarmoured-cable baseline
  2. BW: Indoor armoured, no outer seal
  3. CW: Armoured with outer seal, the workhorse
  4. E1W: Weatherproof single-armour gland
  5. Selection matrix across the four types
  6. Sizing against the SWA selection chart
  7. Accessories, threads and standards discipline
  8. Limitations and what each type cannot do
A2 vs BW vs CW vs E1W Cable Glands: Spec-Driven Selection Map

BS 6121 Part 1 type designations A2, BW, CW and E1W sit on a single decision axis: armoured versus unarmoured cable, then whether the application needs an outer sheath seal, then whether the environment is dry indoor or weather-exposed [S6].

Across brass gland makers, the four types cover roughly the full BS 6121-1:2005 industrial range, with metric entries from M16 to M90, NPT or PG threads, and finishes in natural or nickel-plated brass [S1][S5]. Selection reduces to four questions, in order: armoured or not, indoor or outdoor, IP target, and cable diameter band [S3].

A2 / A1: The unarmoured-cable baseline

A2 is the only one of the four specified for unarmoured plastic or rubber-sheathed cable, with displacement sealing on the cable outer sheath and no armour clamp [S1][S5]. The Raychem RPG A1/A2 datasheet gives IEC/EN 62444 design, IP66 ingress, M20 to M90 metric thread options, and operating temperature of -40 to +100°C on neoprene seals or -50 to +135°C on silicone seals [S5].

Typical clamping range for an M20S A2 gland is 8.5 to 12.0 mm cable outer diameter, with 20 mm across-flat hex and 15 mm entry thread length [S5]. Use A2 when the cable has no armour braid or tape; if a steel-wire-armoured (SWA) cable is specified, A2 cannot provide earth continuity through the armour and is mechanically wrong for the job [S3].

BW: Indoor armoured, no outer seal

BW cable glands are designed to BS 6121-1:2005 and IEC/EN 62444, with a two-part armour lock, no outer sheath sealing, and IP2X as the rated level of protection [S5]. The fundamental difference between BW and CW glands is the outer sheath sealing arrangement, while both retain the armour mechanically [S2].

BW application is dry indoor, for use with all types of SWA cable, plastic or rubber sheathed; finishes are natural or nickel-plated brass, size range 16 to 90 (S and L) [S1]. A typical M25S BW clamp accepts 19.5 to 24.5 mm under-armour diameter at the armour cone, with a 31 mm across-flat hex and 10 mm entry thread length [S5].

CW: Armoured with outer seal, the workhorse

A2 vs BW vs CW vs E1W cable gland types - CW: Armoured with outer seal, the workhorse
A2 vs BW vs CW vs E1W cable gland types - CW: Armoured with outer seal, the workhorse

CW cable glands add an outer sheath seal on top of the BW-style armour clamp, which lets them serve outdoor or indoor armoured applications, with the outer seal providing the IP rating the BW lacks [S1][S3]. Standard reference is BS 6121 Part 1, sizes 16 to 110 in S and L form, natural or nickel-plated brass [S1].

Selection tip from the August 2026 BW-vs-CW guide: pick CW whenever the cable enters a weather-exposed enclosure, a washdown area, or any zone where the outer sheath could wick water past the armour braid [S2]. Accessory stacks also tend to be larger: earth tag, PVC shroud, neoprene or LSF rubber washer, PVC washer, and brass locknut are typically quoted together [S1].

E1W: Weatherproof single-armour gland

E1W type cable gland is specified for single-armoured SWA cable, plastic or rubber sheathed, and is described as weatherproof and waterproof for outdoor or indoor service [S1]. It carries the same two-armour locking principle as CW but with a heavier-duty outer seal arrangement tuned for permanent weather exposure [S3].

Standard reference BS 6121 Part 1, finishes in natural or nickel-plated brass, with all common accessories (earth tag, PVC shroud, neoprene or LSF rubber, PVC washer, brass locknut) listed as options [S1]. In practice, E1W is the default pick when CW's IP rating is borderline for the installation, and the project wants a single gland that covers both indoor risers and outdoor terminations on the same SWA run [S3].

Selection matrix across the four types

A2 vs BW vs CW vs E1W cable gland types - Selection matrix across the four types
A2 vs BW vs CW vs E1W cable gland types - Selection matrix across the four types

Comparison on four decision criteria, drawn from the BS 6121-1:2005 datasheets and the August 2026 selection guide [S2][S5]:

Cable type compatibility: A2 is unarmoured only; BW, CW and E1W are all for armoured (SWA) cable. IP rating: A2 reaches IP66 with a displacement seal on the outer sheath; BW is rated IP2X, dry-indoor only; CW adds an outer seal suitable for outdoor enclosures; E1W is the weatherproof option for permanent outdoor exposure [S1][S3][S5]. Thread and size range: A2 runs M20 to M90, BW runs M16 to M90, CW extends to size 110 in some maker ranges, all available in metric, NPT or PG thread forms [S1][S5]. Earth continuity: BW, CW and E1W all clamp the armour, providing the low-impedance earth path required for SWA; A2 has no armour to clamp and relies on the cable's own earth conductor terminated inside the enclosure [S3][S5].

Sizing against the SWA selection chart

For SWA cable, the brass gland selection chart cross-references conductor size, core count and overall diameter to gland size; a 4-core 10 mm² SWA at 20.3 mm overall maps to gland size 25 across all four armoured-compatible types, while a 4-core 70 mm² at 37.7 mm jumps to size 40 [S4]. That same chart shows the practical upper end: a 4-core 400 mm² SWA at 78.1 mm overall needs a 90 gland, and several combinations in the 95 to 240 mm² range are marked N/A in the smaller size columns, meaning the cable is too large for the smaller gland and forces a step up [S4].

Engineers should size the gland to the cable's bedding (under-armour) diameter for the armour cone and to the overall diameter for the outer seal, then confirm the maker's min/max figures against both before ordering [S3][S5]. Skipping this check is the most common reason a CW or E1W arrives on site and fails the IP test.

Accessories, threads and standards discipline

A2 vs BW vs CW vs E1W cable gland types - Accessories, threads and standards discipline
A2 vs BW vs CW vs E1W cable gland types - Accessories, threads and standards discipline

A complete, sealed installation usually needs more than the gland itself: locknuts, sealing washers, entry-thread reducers or adaptors, shrouds, and earth tags, and ordering these together avoids the classic "gland arrived but we are missing the washer" delay [S3]. A1/A2 datasheets list locknut, earth tag, shrouds and IP washer as standard accessories, with adaptor and reducer as additional items [S5].

Thread form matters: metric ISO entry threads dominate European panel-building, NPT is standard on North American enclosures, and PG remains in legacy German and Indian specifications [S1][S3]. The four types are mechanical designations, not explosion-protection certifications; for hazardous areas, an Ex-rated gland (flameproof Ex d or increased-safety Ex e) must be specified instead, and the broader ATEX/IECEx certification logic is covered separately in process-equipment guidance.

Limitations and what each type cannot do

A2 cannot terminate SWA: there is no armour clamp, so the steel braid would be loose at the entry and earth continuity through the armour is lost [S3][S5]. BW cannot be used outdoors as supplied, because it has no outer sheath seal and is rated IP2X; water tracking along the cable will reach the enclosure [S2][S5].

CW will not reach the IP rating of a fully weatherproof E1W in prolonged immersion or sun-exposed vertical runs, and on very large SWA the standard size range stops at 110, beyond which a maker-specific or custom gland is needed [S1][S3]. E1W is single-armour; for double-armoured (SWA + STA) cable, a different designation outside the A2/BW/CW/E1W set is required [S1][S3].

None of the four is a substitute for an Ex-certified gland in Zone 1 or Zone 2 classified areas, regardless of how good the IP rating looks on paper [S3]. For the broader certification logic when hazardous areas are in scope, see the ATEX/IECEx process-equipment comparison.

Trackable signals for the next quarter: BS 6121 Part 1 revision activity, IEC 62444 updates affecting displacement-seal test methods, and the ongoing migration from PG to metric threads in Indian and Middle-East panel-build specifications.

Component reference pages worth checking: cable gland, gland packing, and cable tray.

This topic is covered further in 16-bit vs 24-bit ADC in a Data Logger: When Resolution Pays Off.

Frequently asked questions

Which BS 6121-1:2005 cable gland type should be used for unarmoured plastic or rubber-sheathed cable?

The A2 designation is the only one of the four specified for unarmoured cable, with displacement sealing on the outer sheath and no armour clamp. A typical M20S A2 accepts 8.5 to 12.0 mm cable outer diameter and reaches IP66 ingress protection. If steel-wire-armoured (SWA) cable is later specified, A2 cannot be used because it provides no earth continuity through armour.

What is the key difference between BW and CW cable glands for SWA cable?

Both BW and CW retain the armour mechanically with a two-part armour lock, but only CW adds an outer sheath seal. BW is rated only IP2X and is therefore limited to dry indoor use, while CW's outer seal lets it serve outdoor or washdown enclosures. A typical M25S BW clamp accepts 19.5 to 24.5 mm under-armour diameter with no weather protection.

When should an E1W gland be specified instead of a CW on an SWA run?

E1W is the weatherproof, waterproof option for single-armoured SWA cable and is selected when CW's IP rating is considered borderline for the installation. It shares the two-armour locking principle of CW but uses a heavier-duty outer seal arrangement tuned for permanent weather exposure. It is the default pick where the same SWA run continues from outdoor terminations into indoor risers.

What size CW or E1W gland is needed for a 4-core 10 mm² SWA cable at 20.3 mm overall diameter?

Per the brass gland selection chart, a 4-core 10 mm² SWA at 20.3 mm overall diameter maps to gland size 25 across all armoured-compatible types including CW and E1W. For larger conductors, a 4-core 70 mm² SWA at 37.7 mm steps up to size 40, and a 4-core 400 mm² at 78.1 mm requires size 90. Engineers must also confirm the under-armour diameter against the maker's min/max before ordering.

6 sources
  1. BW CW A2 E1W Type and PG Threaded Brass Cable Gland
  2. BW vs CW Cable Gland: Don't Pick the Wrong One (Aug 21, 2026)
  3. Cable Gland Types & Selection Guide - Kedar Hub
  4. Brass Cable Gland Selection Chart
  5. Technical Data Sheet A1/A2 Cable gland
  6. Cable Glands

Need to source matching manufacturers or get a quote?

SpecForge connects industrial buyers with verified manufacturers. Submit your requirement and we will route it to matched suppliers.

Submit RFQ now →
Ask SpecForge AI