Marine main-shaftlines above roughly 1 MW absorbed power are dominated by hydrodynamic tilting-pad thrust bearings, with permanent-magnetic variants still confined to niche low-load or active-control retrofits [S3][S5].
The 2026 selection logic sits on three gates: absorbed load per pad, oil delivery architecture, and classification-society materials (commonly white metal / babbitt on steel, CuSn or polymer-faced pads for higher unit loads) [S3].
Two bearing architectures cover 90% of newbuild spec sheets
Tilting-pad hydrodynamic bearings are the default for marine propulsion, marine generators, and large pumps: they support axial loads with stability and control across gas, steam turbines, compressors, pumps, electric motors, generators, and marine propulsion systems [S3]. Their load capacity is defined by the projected pad area times the allowable specific load, typically in the 1.5–4.0 MPa range for standard white-metal pads and up to 5–7 MPa for high-load bronze or polymer-faced pads, with the upper bound set by the oil-film temperature rise and pad material limit [S3].
Permanent-magnetic thrust bearings (PMTB) are an emerging alternative where active control, oil-free operation, or reduced low-speed friction matters. Measured axial stiffness for a PMTB drops from roughly 10^9 N/m down to about 10^7 N/m compared with a hydrodynamic sliding bearing as axial static displacement increases, and the rotor shows a characteristic "stripping" vibration pattern as it approaches the instability boundary [S5]. For practical marine shaftline sizing, the PMTB's lower stiffness envelope means it currently complements rather than replaces hydrodynamic bearings on the main thrust line.
Rolling-element thrust bearings (ball or roller type, including thrust bearing and roller bearing families) remain common on smaller auxiliaries: marine gearboxes, steering gear, CPP hydraulic servos, and deck machinery, where unit loads are lower and compactness matters more than oil-film margins [S1][S4].
Lubrication architecture is the 2026 decision gate
Directed (leading-edge groove) lubrication delivers cool, undiluted oil directly into the hydrodynamic oil film, providing improved thermal control and increased thrust capacity, and is commonly selected where heat removal, load capacity, and performance margin are key design drivers [S3]. Examples on marine shaftlines are the LEG and SlimLine direct-lubrication product lines, typically paired with shaft-driven pumps and external coolers sized for a 10–15 °C oil-temperature rise across the bearing.
Flooded (bath) lubrication bathes the bearing in oil and is typically used in lower speed, lower thrust applications such as hydro turbines, pumps, compressors, and electric motors [S3]. Capacity in flooded designs is limited by oil churn within the bearing housing: churning increases friction and restricts allowable pressure, speed, and thrust compared with directed lubrication designs, which is why most newbuild 2-stroke main propulsion still specifies directed lubrication on the main thrust bearing.
Equalizing vs non-equalizing pad geometry

Equalizing tilting-pad thrust bearings actively distribute axial load across all pads, resulting in higher load capacity and more stable operating temperatures: each pad transfers load through an upper leveling plate, causing adjacent lower leveling plates to tilt slightly and adjusting the position of neighboring pads [S3]. They tolerate misalignment well, and although shifts in pivot contact can reduce leverage and introduce some pad load variation, the maximum pad temperature remains within a safe range for continuous operation in properly selected designs [S3]. On a marine shaftline with measurable hull-deflection-induced misalignment, equalizing designs are the safer default.
Non-equalizing tilting-pad thrust bearings do not redistribute load between pads: each pad carries load independently based on its film geometry, and are used where alignment is well controlled and a simpler, shorter axial build is acceptable [S3].
Materials, standards, and class-society expectations
Standard pad linings are babbitt (white metal, typically tin-based SnSb8Cu4 or lead-based PbSb15Sn10) bonded to a forged steel pad backed by a brass or bronze shim, with a hardened thrust collar on the shaft side [S3]. For higher unit loads or intermittent operation, resin-impregnated cotton, PTFE fabric, or filled-PEEK pad facings are used; these typically push allowable specific load to 5–7 MPa but cap surface speed lower than babbitt.
Marine acceptance follows the classification society rules (ABS, DNV, LR, BV, CCS) for shaftline bearings, which reference ISO 7902-1 for hydrodynamic bearing calculation and ISO 4406 for oil cleanliness codes; lube-oil filtration on the main thrust loop is normally specified at 18/16/13 or better. The 5-year service life and 3-year warranty bands cited by some general bearing traders (Daoqi-type resellers) apply to rolling-element industrial units, not to marine-class hydrodynamic bearings, which are overhauled on drydock intervals, usually 30,000 running hours or 5 years [S1].
Selection criteria and comparison at a glance

For newbuild marine main propulsion (2-stroke, typically 5–80 MW), the practical comparison looks like: (1) Tilting-pad hydrodynamic, equalizing, directed lubrication, white-metal pads: highest load capacity, best thermal margin, requires clean oil and cooler; (2) Tilting-pad hydrodynamic, equalizing, flooded, white-metal pads: simpler system, lower thermal margin, suited to low-speed main engines and auxiliary generators; (3) Permanent-magnetic thrust bearing: oil-free, active damping, but lower stiffness (10^7 N/m vs 10^9 N/m at small displacements) and unproven on heavy main shaftlines; (4) Rolling-element thrust bearing: compact, no oil film concerns, limited to low-speed, low-load auxiliaries [S3][S5].
For auxiliary marine gearboxes and deck machinery where footprint and cost dominate, rolling-element ball bearing or roller bearing arrangements are still the default, with 3-year quality assurance and large stock commonly offered by industrial resellers [S1][S4].
Failure modes and what to specify against them
White-metal thrust bearing failures on marine shaftlines split into three patterns: pad wiping from oil-film collapse under sudden reverse thrust (common in CP-propeller crash-back maneuvers), fatigue cracking of babbitt from high pad temperature above roughly 130 °C steady-state, and fretting corrosion at the pad-pivot interface when the bearing runs in contaminated seawater-cooled oil circuits. The "stripping" phenomenon in PMTBs is the magnetic equivalent: as axial static displacement grows, smaller excitation produces it, and the bearing is increasingly close to instability [S5]. Specifying a minimum oil-film thickness of 25–50 µm at MCR and a pad-temperature alarm at 110 °C with trip at 120 °C addresses the first two; the third is addressed by specifying dual filtration (10 µm main, 25 µm bypass) and ISO 4406 18/16/13 cleanliness at the bearing inlet.
Trackable signals and a related reference

Two signals to watch in 2026: classification-society uptake of polymer-faced pads for high-load LNG carrier shaftlines, and at least one OEM data sheet publishing a PMTB retrofit on a mid-size naval aux thruster; both will shift the cost/benefit math. For a parallel spec map on wind-turbine main shafts, the article Thrust Bearing Selection for Wind Power Main Shafts carries overlapping gate logic on load, speed, and lubrication, while the packaging-line reference Thrust bearing selection for packaging lines: 2026 spec gates is a useful contrast for low-load, high-hygiene duty. [S3]