REQUEST FOR QUOTE Request a quote
SpecForge Editorial Team

Strapping Band Selection for Air Cargo: TSO-C172, Composite vs Steel, ULD Rules

Table of Contents
  1. Regulatory baseline: TSO-C172, FAA AC120-85A, and IATA ULDR
  2. Material families and their break-strength envelope
  3. Selection criteria for air-cargo ULDs
  4. Comparison: composite vs steel for air-cargo ULDs
  5. Use cases and limits in air-cargo operations
  6. Sourcing and operational signals to track
Strapping Band Selection for Air Cargo: TSO-C172, Composite vs Steel, ULD Rules

Air-cargo strapping operates under a stricter rule set than ground logistics: FAA TSO-C172 Cargo Restraint Strap Assemblies has been the Minimum Performance Standard for any strap used in U.S. air-cargo operations since 2011, and the IATA ULD Panel ruled that, from 1 January 2016, only TSO-approved straps are accepted on passenger and freighter aircraft in IATA-member operations [S3].

For palletized air cargo, strap selection is a primary-restraint decision only when no cargo net is present; where a net covers the load, straps sit underneath as secondary restraint, per the FAA position reproduced in IATA ULD Regulations [S3]. The four material families in current industrial use are polypropylene (PP), polyester (PET), steel, and woven/composite polyester, each with distinct breaking strength, tension retention, and elongation behaviour, and the same applies to strapping band selection in any pallet-build context.

Regulatory baseline: TSO-C172, FAA AC120-85A, and IATA ULDR

FAA TSO-C172 Cargo Restraint Strap Assemblies, published in 2011, is the first comprehensive Minimum Performance Standard covering air-cargo straps of any type, and the post-accident revision of FAA AC120-85A added Section 2.8 (Transport of Special Cargo) and Section 3.3.3.2 (Tie Down Strap Authorization) explicitly to govern strap-based restraint where the load cannot sit under a net [S3].

The investigation into the 2013 National Air Cargo flight 102 crash exposed a gap between strap usage and any prescribed practice, which drove both the AC120-85A revision and an overhaul of IATA ULDR section OS 6/07. That ULDR section now sets specific positioning and spacing rules for cargo-strap attachment points into a pallet, a rule that emerged after testing showed that clustered attachment points could overload the aircraft Cargo Loading System restraint latches, even when the pallet itself was strong enough [S3].

Procurement teams should treat strap selection as a regulatory activity, not a packaging one. U.S. ground freight falls under FMCSA cargo-securement rules requiring aggregate working load limit of all securement devices to reach at least one-half the weight of the article secured, and air-cargo rules layer stricter TSO-C172 evidence of compliance on top of that baseline [S4].

Material families and their break-strength envelope

Woven and composite straps use co-extruded high-tenacity polyester yarns as the load-bearing core: composite strap coats those yarns in polypropylene, hot-melt strap uses a hot-melt coating, and woven strap adds double-locked weaving with a cold-glue surface coating [S1]. All three eliminate the sharp-edge injury risk of steel and PET straps and will not fail from a single point of impact.

Steel strapping remains the highest tensile-strength option in the family and is the default where the cargo is hot, sharp-edged, or pointed, but its rigidity means tension is lost abruptly as soon as the strap yields, with no elastic recovery to absorb dynamic loads [S2][S5]. PET strapping has high tensile strength and low tension relaxation, making it the standard heavy-pallet choice in ground logistics; PP strapping has high tension relaxation and is therefore limited to light, short-duration loads such as cartons and parcels [S2].

Tensile, retention, and flexibility for the four families line up as: PET: high strength, low relaxation, high flexibility; PP: medium strength, high relaxation, high flexibility; textile/composite: high strength, low relaxation, high flexibility; steel: very high strength, low relaxation, low flexibility, with the flexibility gap driving most of the cargo-settlement failures seen in service [S2].

Selection criteria for air-cargo ULDs

Strapping Band selection for air cargo - Selection criteria for air-cargo ULDs
Strapping Band selection for air cargo - Selection criteria for air-cargo ULDs

For an air-cargo ULD build, five criteria drive the right pick, and only the last one is purely mechanical: regulatory eligibility (TSO-C172 approval), aircraft compatibility (rated for the seat-track and CLS latch system), load profile (irregular, overhanging, or sharp-edged), environmental exposure (UV, moisture, temperature swing on the ramp), and tensile/elongation behaviour relative to the dynamic forces a ULD sees in flight [S3][S4][S5].

Composite and woven polyester straps absorb dynamic impact through their elongation ability and flexible memory, so a strap tensioned at build does not snap when the load settles mid-flight, a behaviour the steel alternative cannot replicate because steel behaves as a rigid band and loses system tension the moment the cargo compresses even slightly [S1][S5].

Buckles are not interchangeable across systems. Wire-buckle joints on woven/composite strap need a buckle matched to the strap width and wire thickness; the buckle joint efficiency outperforms traditional crimping and friction welding for textile systems, and standard phosphated or galvanized buckles are commonly offered in wire thicknesses from 2.90 mm to 7 mm and lengths from 13 mm to 40 mm [S1].

Comparison: composite vs steel for air-cargo ULDs

On a like-for-like air-cargo ULD build, the comparison lands as: composite/woven polyester wins on weight (roughly one-fifth the weight of steel at the same working load), on worker safety (no sharp edges, no rust), on dynamic-load handling (elastic recovery absorbs cargo settlement), and on tooling (tensioned with simple hand tools), while steel still wins on absolute breaking strength and on hot or sharp-edged cargo where polymer would melt or be cut through [S1][S2][S5].

System strength is what matters in service, not the strap alone, so the practical decision is: composite/woven polyester for vehicles, helicopters, and overhanging items built on a floating pallet where the strap is the primary restraint and the cargo is irregular; steel for steel coils, hot-rolled plate, and bundles of sharp-edged extrusions where polymer abrasion or heat would compromise the strap [S2][S3][S5]. Buckle and tensioner selection must be matched to the strap material, since a steel-buckle system on composite strap, or vice versa, will not deliver the rated joint efficiency [S1].

Use cases and limits in air-cargo operations

Strapping Band selection for air cargo - Use cases and limits in air-cargo operations
Strapping Band selection for air cargo - Use cases and limits in air-cargo operations

Primary-restraint strap-only ULDs are now the standard for vehicles, helicopters, and other large overhanging items that cannot fit under a net, and for floating-pallet builds where the load is tied directly to the aircraft floor, both of which depend on TSO-C172 straps and the AC120-85A special-cargo provisions [S3].

Strap-only builds hit their limit on very dense, sharp-edged, or hot cargo, where steel remains the only material that survives the load itself, and on loads whose restraint-latch demand on the aircraft CLS exceeds the rated capacity of the seat-track cluster, a configuration that the revised ULDR OS 6/07 now explicitly restricts by spacing and position [S3]. PP strapping is not appropriate for air-cargo ULD primary restraint because its high tension relaxation will not hold aircraft-rated dynamic loads over a multi-leg itinerary, even though it remains the dominant material for ground-shipment carton unitization [S2][S4].

Sourcing and operational signals to track

Buyers should require a TSO-C172 marking on every air-cargo strap and a buckle spec matching the strap family, since mixed systems quietly drop joint efficiency below the rated system strength, and they should anchor decisions to FAA AC120-85A and IATA ULDR OS 6/07 rather than to vendor literature alone [S3]. Sourcing from suppliers with broad inventory and same-day fulfillment prevents line stoppages when strap stock runs low on a ULD build, an operational risk that has grown as the global packaging strapping materials market heads toward a projected $15.7 billion by 2033 at a 6.0% CAGR [S4].

Two signals worth tracking into late 2026: any further revision of IATA ULDR OS 6/07 attachment-point spacing tables following additional CLS-latch testing, and any harmonization of FAA TSO-C172 acceptance with the EU EASA cargo-restraint framework, since mixed-fleet operators currently maintain two approval files per strap part number. Buyers comparing adjacent restraint hardware can also review FIBC bulk bag selection for ground-freight parallels and consult the air impact wrench page for tensioner-tooling duty cycles used in ramp-side ULD builds.

Frequently asked questions

Is FAA TSO-C172 approval mandatory for strapping used on IATA-member aircraft?

Yes. Per the article, the IATA ULD Panel ruled that from 1 January 2016 only TSO-approved straps are accepted on passenger and freighter aircraft in IATA-member operations, with TSO-C172 having been the Minimum Performance Standard for U.S. air-cargo straps since 2011.

What weight advantage does composite polyester strapping have over steel at the same working load?

The article states that composite or woven polyester weighs roughly one-fifth the weight of steel at the same working load limit, while also eliminating the sharp-edge injury risk and rust issues associated with steel banding.

What wire-buckle thickness range is commonly offered for woven or composite strapping systems?

Standard phosphated or galvanized buckles for woven and composite strapping are commonly offered in wire thicknesses from 2.90 mm to 7 mm, with corresponding buckle lengths from 13 mm to 40 mm, matched to the strap width and wire thickness.

When is steel strapping still preferred over composite polyester for air-cargo ULDs?

Steel remains the default per the article for cargo that is hot, sharp-edged, or pointed, such as steel coils, hot-rolled plate, and bundles of sharp-edged extrusions, where polymer straps would melt, be cut through, or suffer unacceptable abrasion.

5 sources
  1. Strapping Solutions for Cargo Safety - Dunnage Air Bags
  2. Strapping Bands: Safety for Load Security and Transport.
  3. Straps 2016: A New Era (Apr 21, 2016)
  4. Best Strapping Bands for Industrial Packaging & Shipping (Jun 2, 2026)
  5. Composite Strapping vs Steel Strapping Guide | Tensipack (Sep 4, 2026)

Need to source matching manufacturers or get a quote?

SpecForge connects industrial buyers with verified manufacturers. Submit your requirement and we will route it to matched suppliers.

Submit RFQ now →
Ask SpecForge AI