Three-Way Valve

A three-way valve is a single body with three pipe connections and one trim that routes flow between two circuits instead of simply opening and closing one. Depending on how the ports are arranged and which way the fluid travels, the same valve either blends two incoming streams into one common outgoing stream or takes one incoming stream and divides it between two outgoing paths. It exists to replace a pair of two-way valves plus interlock logic in circuits that must keep total flow or circuit flow constant while the load moves: heating and cooling coils with constant flow pumps, changeover circuits that swap between heat sources, and blending loops that hold a mixed temperature at a sensor. Sizes run from DN 15 threaded and socket weld bodies to DN 600 flanged rotary assemblies.

Procurement engineers meet these valves in air handling units, district heating substations, compressor and engine cooling, pasteurizer and CIP loops, and chilled water plants built a generation ago around constant flow hydraulics. The decision this page settles is narrow and practical: which porting arrangement the circuit needs, blending two streams into one or dividing one stream into two, stated as a flow direction at each port; whether modulating duty calls for a seated plug body or a rotary ball pattern; what flow coefficient each path must carry; and what actuation closes the loop. A misordered porting is not a performance shortfall, it is an instability problem, because a trim built to blend two streams will hunt when forced to divide one, and that hunting usually survives every attempt to tune it away.

Cast-body Fisher DN50 PN40 globe control valve installed in stainless steel pipework with bolted bonnet flange and stem handwheel, representative of the globe bodies three-way control valves are built in

Photo: Bitjungle, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons

This page treats the three-way valve as a purchasing object: how port geometry decides whether a body blends two streams or divides one, why the flow direction at each port belongs in the RFQ, what flow coefficient each path must carry and how valve authority is set, and how coil, blending, and changeover circuits map onto seated plug and rotary constructions. It is written for engineers who write purchase specifications, not for readers who want a brochure summary.

Chapter 1 / 06

What a Three-Way Valve Is and What Is Being Decided

The anatomy is fixed by the ports. Catalogs label the connections A, B, and C, with C the common port that participates in every flow path. A seated plug body carries two seats and one plug with two seating faces or a linked pair of plugs, so that stroke simultaneously opens one path and closes the other while C stays in circuit. A rotary body carries a ported ball or plug that aligns its bore with different port pairs as it turns. What the valve never does is provide three independent shutoffs: it is a routing and proportioning instrument, and the two duties it must be ordered against are blending two streams and dividing one stream, which look identical in a catalog photograph and behave very differently in a control loop.

What is being decided in this purchase is therefore three commitments at once. First, the circuit commitment: the plant hydraulic scheme, constant flow coil circuits with bypass, changeover between sources, or temperature blending, decides the porting and the flow direction at every connection. Second, the construction commitment: a seated plug trim for modulating proportioning, or a rotary ball pattern for two-position routing at lower cost. Third, the actuation commitment: a spring diaphragm or piston actuator with a positioner for control duty, or a simple on-off operator for switching. Buying the body without deciding all three is how a plant ends up with a valve that routes correctly and controls not at all.

Against the neighboring scheme of two coordinated two-way valves, the trade is hydraulic. Two two-way control valve bodies with a pump on a variable speed drive shed pumping energy at part load, because flow that the circuit does not need is never pumped. The three-way valve keeps total flow roughly constant through the pump while redistributing it between the load and the bypass, which older chillers, boilers, and coils were designed around for stable heat transfer and minimum flow protection. Neither scheme is universally right; the plant generation, the pump control, and the minimum flow requirement decide, and the RFQ should state which regime the valve is entering rather than leaving the supplier to guess from the pipe size.

The trap that justifies this page's existence is porting direction. A trim designed to blend two incoming streams, with the plug arranged so flow tends to open it, is mechanically unstable when the same body is installed to divide one incoming stream into two outgoing paths: near the closing seat, flow direction that lifts the plug creates jet forces that pull the plug toward and away from the seat faster than the positioner can correct, and the loop cycles no matter how it is tuned. Manufacturers sell both arrangements deliberately, some as separate castings and some as the same body with a reversed plug and cage. The single sentence that prevents the failure is the RFQ line that states flow direction at each of A, B, and C at design load, and chapter 2 explains the mechanics behind it.

The family context rounds out the decision. Seated three-way trims grow directly out of globe valve engineering, with parabolic plugs and the same leakage and characterization vocabulary. Rotary three-way bodies descend from the ball valve and the plug valve lines, inheriting quarter-turn compactness and full bore capacity. Two-position changeover between two sources is often driven by a solenoid valve operator rather than a modulating actuator. In a district heating substation the valve sits downstream of a pressure reducing valve that sets station inlet pressure, beside a safety relief valve protecting the heat exchanger, behind a check valve on each pump discharge, and under gate valve isolation for maintenance. Naming those neighbors in the RFQ lets one supplier check pressure class, flange drilling, and face-to-face across the package in a single pass.

Chapter 2 / 06

How Port Geometry Governs Mixing and Diverting Duty

Seated trim mechanics first, because they carry the stability argument. In the blending arrangement, two streams enter at A and B and the mixed stream leaves at the common port C. The plug strokes against flow that tends to open it: pressure from both incoming streams acts on the plug faces in a direction that unseats it, so the seating force is well defined, the jet forces are stabilizing, and the plug position maps cleanly onto the blended proportion across the whole stroke. This is the arrangement a temperature loop wants when it is mixing return water with hot supply to hold a downstream sensor at setpoint, and it is the arrangement most small modulating bodies were designed around.

The dividing arrangement reverses the traffic. One stream enters at the common port C and leaves at A or B in proportions the trim sets, and a seated body built for this duty puts the flow under the plug at the seating port: the incoming stream acts on the plug in the closing direction across the seat it is modulating, so the hydrodynamic force presses the plug onto the seat it is controlling rather than lifting it. That single geometric difference is why dividing duty cannot simply be trusted to a blending body. With flow over a plug arranged for blending, the same pressure that stabilized the mixed stream destabilizes the divided one, and the classic symptom is hunting that concentrates in the last 10 to 20 percent of stroke toward either seat, where the velocity through the narrowing gap is highest.

Rotary bodies route by port alignment instead of plug seating. A T-port ball drills the common port through a straight bore and adds a side window, so in the 180 degree positions the valve connects C straight through to one branch while the other closes, and in the mid position it connects all three at once for blending duty. An L-port ball connects adjacent port pairs only, so its 90 degree positions route C to A or C to B with positive closure of the unused branch, which matches changeover circuits that must never bridge two sources. A three-way plug valve does the same with a ported plug turning in a tapered or cylindrical seat, often in multi-stop arrangements. These patterns are honest two-position routers; modulating proportioning with a ball is possible but coarsely characterized, which is why chapter 5 keeps seated trim in the modulating role.

Capacity is not one number. The common port path C to A usually carries a different flow coefficient from each branch path, and seated bodies differ between the blending and dividing flow directions even on the same castings. Representative full-open values: a DN 50 seated body near Cv 100 on the common path and Cv 60 to 80 on a branch path; a DN 100 near Cv 420 and 300 respectively; a DN 200 T-port ball near Cv 1,600 on straight-through and roughly half that through the branch window. Sizing must therefore be done per path against its own design flow, and the worst path differential sets the actuator load, because the unbalance force on the plug follows the path coefficient and the pressure drop together. A datasheet that lists one Cv for a three-way body has not finished its job.

Closed-path leakage, called crossport leakage, is the quiet specification gap. At low load a coil circuit drives most flow to bypass, and the small fraction that sneaks across the seating port that should be shut becomes a larger and larger share of what actually reaches the coil; a body with class IV crossport rates can hold a room at half load with the valve commanding full bypass. Blending accuracy is the second quiet number: matched branch characteristics within a few percent keep the mixed temperature linear in actuator signal, which a temperature loop notices as symmetric response around setpoint. Both numbers appear on serious datasheets, and both belong in the RFQ acceptance block.

Chapter 3 / 06

Types, Construction, and Duty Boundaries

The seated plug body is the modulating workhorse. Bronze and cast iron served the HVAC industry for decades; modern process builds use WCB carbon steel and CF8M stainless steel bodies from DN 15 to about DN 300, with parabolic plugs for equal percentage response, balanced plugs where the differential demands it, the same leakage and characterization vocabulary a two-way globe valve carries, and stem guiding top and bottom so the plug stays aligned across both seats. PTFE soft seats hold FCI 70-2 class VI shutoff on each port; metal seats serve steam and hot oil at the price of class IV rates. This construction delivers the stable, characterized proportioning that temperature and blending loops need, and it is the default recommendation whenever the word modulating appears in the duty description.

The three-way ball body is the routing economizer. T-port and L-port patterns built into a threaded or flanged ball valve envelope, DN 15 to DN 600, switch a circuit between sources, loads, or drains at a fraction of the cost of a seated control body, with full bore capacity, low pressure drop, and bubble tight soft seated shutoff of the unused branch. Modulating duty is possible on characterized versions, but the characteristic is coarse compared with a parabolic plug and the port geometry constrains the paths, so the honest role is two-position changeover and diverting selection rather than continuous blending. For skids where a PLC simply needs circuit A today and circuit B tomorrow, this is the right body, often driven by a compact electric actuator or a solenoid valve operator, and the seated premium is wasted money.

The wider family fills the corners. A three-way plug valve handles changeover in lubricated and sleeved designs where slurries or high temperature exclude soft seated balls. Large water headers from DN 400 sometimes use butterfly based three-way arrangements, two interlinked disc valves in a tee fitting, which save body cost but inherit the modest rangeability of the disc and the coordination problems of two linkages; the butterfly valve based scheme is a hydraulic compromise that belongs only where seated bodies stop being affordable. At the small dosing end, below about Cv 1, a bank of two-way bodies or a needle valve trim meters with better resolution than any three-way trim offers.

Materials and ratings follow standard valve practice. Bodies come in WCB, CF8M stainless steel, and occasionally duplex for chloride services; classes run CL150 and CL300 flanged with PN16 and PN40 metric equivalents, plus NPT or BSP threaded and socket weld ends at small sizes. Face-to-face follows ISO 5752 so flanged bodies interchange between makers, and pressure temperature ratings follow ANSI B16.34 by class and material, which matters most on hot water and steam circuits where a CL150 stainless body carries a different curve than a carbon steel one. Seat temperature limits decide the trim: PTFE to about 200 deg C, metal above that, elastomer lined small valves lower.

Boundaries are worth stating before the table. A three-way body is not a backflow preventer; each circuit that must not reverse still needs its own check valve. It is not a safety device and never stands in for a safety relief valve. It cannot isolate for maintenance on its own, so flange or threaded isolation sits beside it. Dividing duty on high differential liquids needs a cavitation check exactly as a two-way station would. And a trim that can close both outlet paths on a constant speed pump can deadhead it, which is a system failure the valve merely triggers; chapter 5 carries the protection language.

The table below compresses the porting decision into the form a specifier can carry into a review meeting; it pairs each port arrangement with the flow paths, the trim behavior, and the circuit where it belongs.

Port arrangementFlow pathsTrim behaviorCircuits it suitsMisapplication risk
Blending, seatedA plus B in, C outFlow tends to open the plug; stable across strokeTemperature blending, mixed loop setpoint controlInstalled to divide a stream: hunts near both seats
Dividing, seatedC in, A plus B out in proportionFlow under the plug at the seating port; stable modulating splitCoil and bypass distribution, load switching with proportioningBlending trim substituted to save cost: instability at part load
T-port ballC straight through or all three alignedTwo-position routing, full bore capacitySource or drain selection, straight-through changeoverContinuous proportioning: coarse, poorly characterized control
L-port ballC to A or C to B, 90 degree positionsTwo-position routing with positive branch closureChangeover between heat sources, circuit selectionBlending duty: cannot align all three ports
Ported plug, multi-stopC to A, B, or A plus B by positionTwo or three position routing, robust in dirty serviceSlurry and high temperature changeoverModulating duty: not a control instrument
Chapter 4 / 06

Key Specification Parameters

The table below decodes the datasheet lines that decide whether a quoted body matches the circuit. Each row is a purchase defining parameter; the paragraphs after the table explain what to demand and what a weak answer looks like.

AttributeTypical range or optionsWhat it decides
Nominal sizeDN 15 to DN 600, seated control volume DN 15 to DN 300Pipe schedule, flange drilling, face-to-face, and actuator frame size
Pressure classCL150 and CL300; PN16 and PN40; threaded ends small sizesBody rating per ANSI B16.34 and the seat derate at temperature
Porting and flow directionBlending, A plus B to C; dividing, C to A plus B; stated per portTrim orientation, stability near seats, and which catalog Cv applies
Cv per path, representativeDN 50: 100 common, 60 to 80 branch; DN 100: 420 and 300; DN 200 ball: 1,600 and 800Sizing of each path and the actuator unbalance at worst differential
CharacteristicEqual percentage parabolic plug; linear option; rotary coarseLoop gain and blending linearity across the stroke
Crossport leakage classFCI 70-2 class VI soft seat; class IV metalCoil control credibility at low load and blending accuracy
Seat and temperaturePTFE to 200 deg C; metal above; elastomer lined lowerSeat compound, derate curve, and shutoff credibility at heat
Body materialsBronze, cast iron, WCB, CF8M stainless steel, duplexCorrosion envelope, code acceptance, and installed weight
ActuationSpring diaphragm, piston, or electric with three point controlStroke time, fail action, and positioner compatibility
Face-to-face and endsISO 5752 flanged; NPT, BSP, socket weld smallDrop-in geometry against existing spools and flanges

Authority is the sizing concept that ties the Cv rows to the circuit. Valve authority is the valve pressure drop at design flow divided by the total drop of the circuit including the valve, and the workable band is 0.25 to 0.5. Below about 0.25 the coil, exchanger, or pipework reclaims control as load varies, and the valve command flattens: the loop looks sluggish at high load and overshoots at low. Above about 0.5 the plant pays for pump head that the valve burns as noise and seat wear for no control benefit. Because authority is a circuit property, the RFQ must state the design flow and available drop per path, and the supplier sized path coefficients check the buyer's number rather than the reverse.

Characterization follows the loop type. Temperature blending and coil loops want equal percentage plugs, because the heat transfer curve of a coil is itself nonlinear and the exponential plug flattens the combined gain. Flow proportioning loops, such as additive dosing into a carrier, want the linear option where offered. At the small end, the seated three-way body loses out below about Cv 1, where a needle valve or a small two-way trim meters with far better resolution, and honest engineers specify that instead. The path Cv table below gives representative figures a specifier can use for first-pass layout before supplier data arrives.

SizeCv, common path CCv, each branch pathTypical construction at this size
DN 252515 to 20Threaded bronze or stainless seated body
DN 5010060 to 80Flanged or grooved seated body, spring diaphragm actuator
DN 80260160 to 200Seated body, piston actuator common
DN 100420280 to 320Seated body or T-port ball by duty
DN 150950600 to 750T-port ball for changeover, seated for control
DN 2001,600800 to 1,000Flanged ball, gear or actuator operated
DN 300 to DN 6003,800 to beyond 15,000Half to two thirds of commonFlanged rotary, usually two-position duty

Actuation closes the specification. Modulating seated bodies pair with a spring diaphragm or piston pneumatic valve actuator and a valve positioner, sized on the worst port unbalance plus margin, with fail action chosen against what the circuit must do on air loss, usually fail to bypass so the load sees full flow. HVAC duty commonly uses an electric actuator with three point floating control, and linear actuators on seated bodies mount on the same yoke patterns the two-way family uses, while rotary bodies follow ISO 5210 interfaces. Stroke time belongs in the specification where sequences matter: a blending loop tolerates seconds, a compressor protection diverting loop may not.

Chapter 5 / 06

Selection Decision Factors and RFQ Language

The selection sequence below is compact enough to run line by line in a specification meeting, and each step removes a class of quotations before any price comparison starts.

  1. Fix the circuit function first: constant flow coil with bypass, changeover between sources, or sensor blending. The function fixes the porting, not the other way round.
  2. State flow direction at A, B, and C at design load. This one line separates the blending and dividing trims and prevents the instability described in chapter 2.
  3. Compute design flow and available drop per path, then set valve authority between 0.25 and 0.5 and size each path coefficient against its own flow.
  4. Decide modulating or two-position. Modulating buys a seated plug trim and a positioner; two-position changeover buys a ball pattern and saves the money.
  5. Check dividing duty for cavitation at maximum differential and temperature, using the supplier factors, before the order, not at commissioning.
  6. Set crossport leakage acceptance in class language, because coil control at low load lives on this number.
  7. Package the actuation: actuator on worst unbalance with margin, valve positioner matched to signal, fail action stated, stroke time stated where sequences care.
  8. Protect the system: verify the trim cannot deadhead a constant speed pump in any commanded position, and confirm the surrounding safety relief valve and check valve coverage in the P&ID.

The comparison against neighboring valve types, which belongs here in the selection chapter, reduces to three sentences. The two-way control valve pair with a variable speed pump is the energy answer when the plant hydraulics allow it, and every new design owes itself that calculation before a three-way body is ordered. The butterfly valve based tee arrangement wins only on first cost at large diameter, and pays it back in coordination and characterization problems. The seated three-way body wins wherever the circuit genuinely needs constant flow or the source genuinely needs a fixed draw, and the honest RFQ says which of those two reasons applies, because it changes the Cv and the failure strategy.

The application map below turns the checklist into a table the project file can carry into a review meeting.

ApplicationConstruction to specifyCheck before order
Chilled or hot water coil with bypass, constant flow pumpSeated dividing trim, equal percentage plug, fail to bypassFlow direction at C as inlet; authority 0.25 to 0.5; crossport class at low load
AHU changeover between heat and cool sourcesL-port ball or ported plug, two-position actuator with limit switchesPositive closure of unused branch; never bridge sources in transit position
Domestic hot water blending at a sensorSeated blending trim, linear or equal percentage by sensor locationMatched branch paths; cold water sweep at maximum hot demand
District heating substation mixing loopSeated blending trim, PN40 flanged, metal or PTFE seat by temperatureDownstream of the pressure reducing valve setting; cavitation check on dividing branch
Compressor or engine cooling divertingSeated dividing trim with fast stroke, or ball where two-position sufficesStroke time against protection sequence; deadhead impossibility verified
Large header source selection, DN 400 plusT-port ball or linked butterfly arrangement, two-positionCoordination of linked discs; characterization abandoned knowingly

The RFQ block should be written once and reused. A complete block reads: quantity, size, and class; porting arrangement and flow direction at each of A, B, and C at design load; design flow, design drop, and required coefficient per path; characteristic and modulating span or two-position behavior; crossport leakage class and test basis; fluid with chemistry, solids, and temperature envelope including cycles; maximum steady and transient differential; seat, body, plug, and stem materials; actuator type, fail action, stroke time, and valve positioner signal; face-to-face per ISO 5752 with end and flange drilling details; and the evidence required: path Cv table, leakage test certificates, pressure temperature data per ANSI B16.34, and material certificates EN 10204 3.1. A quotation that answers the porting line with the word universal has not understood the question, and that fact is cheaper to learn at RFQ stage than at 2 a.m. in commissioning.

Chapter 6 / 06

Installation, Standards, Failure Modes, and Maintenance

Installation quality decides whether the trim reaches its catalog life. Piping symmetry matters more than on a two-way body: equal leg lengths and matched fittings on the two branches keep the path coefficients as drawn, because a short swept branch and a long restricted branch unbalance a proportioning loop in a way no positioner fixes. Give the common port about 5 pipe diameters of straight run, keep both branch paths as symmetric as the rack allows, and honor the flow direction arrows the manufacturer stamps on the body, which for dividing trims encode the flow-under-the-plug geometry from chapter 2. Flange bolts come up in a cross pattern to the torque table, and the valve is supported independently so line strain never loads the seat alignment.

Commissioning verifies three things in order. First, routing: stroke the valve end to end and confirm which port closes at each extreme, because reversed port labels are a real and embarrassing failure. Second, calibration: set the positioner zero and span with the valve wet and at working pressure, then record hysteresis across three mid-span steps; a seated body with more than 2 to 3 percent hysteresis has a packing or linkage problem to fix before tuning. Third, stability: run the loop at low load, where the seat region velocities are highest, specifically to prove the porting decision, and treat any hunting there as a porting or sizing defect rather than a tuning problem. File the stroke record as the condition baseline.

The standards set the verification frame. ISO 5752 fixes face-to-face so flanged bodies interchange between makers. ANSI B16.34 governs wall thickness and pressure temperature ratings by class and material. FCI 70-2 defines the seat and crossport leakage classes quoted on certificates, and IEC 60534 provides the control valve vocabulary and test context that serious datasheets cite. Fire qualification to API 607 or ISO 10497 must be demanded explicitly where soft seated bodies sit in fire risk areas, because none carries it by default. A specification that names these standards in the RFQ block moves the burden of proof onto the supplier, which is where it belongs.

Failure modes follow a short list. Seat and plug wear raises crossport leakage first, seen as rooms that overheat at low load or blends that drift off setpoint at small command; the fix is regrinding or seat replacement at a planned stop. Hunting near a seat, if it survived commissioning, means a blending trim in dividing duty, an oversized body operating below 10 percent travel, or a worn positioner feedback linkage, in roughly that order of likelihood. Cavitation damage on a dividing path appears as noise and seat pitting under high differential, remedied by staging the drop or lowering the drop with upstream resistance. Deadheading a constant speed pump when a commanded position closes both outlet paths starves the pump and can wreck its seal; the protection is a bypass, a relief path, or a trim geometry verified never to close both paths at once. Packing leakage is routine: adjust, then replace the set on schedule rather than after the stem scores.

Maintenance scales with duty. HVAC bodies on clean treated water earn an annual stroke, hysteresis check, and packing adjustment, with an internal seat inspection at the first major plant shutdown after five years. Blending loops on hard or scaling water deserve the seat inspection earlier and a scale check on the plug guiding, because deposition on the guides is what converts a smooth proportional trim into a sticky one. Dividing loops with high differential add a yearly listen for cavitation at maximum load. Whether the loop rides a pneumatic valve actuator or an electric actuator, its fail action is proven on the same schedule as the loop's other proof tests, and every result lands in the file the next RFQ reads, which is how a purchasing specification improves instead of merely aging.

FAQ

Can one three-way valve body do both blending and splitting duty?

Only if the trim is built for it. Seated three-way trims are manufactured with a defined flow direction per port: blending service, two inlets to one common outlet, is stable with flow tending to open the plug, while splitting service, one inlet to two outlets, needs flow under the plug at the seating port. A blending body installed to split a stream will hunt near the closed port. State the flow direction at every port in the RFQ and let the supplier map the trim to it.

Should I specify an L-port or a T-port ball for changeover?

The T-port ball connects the common port with both branch ports through a straight bore plus a side window, so it suits straight-through blending positions and full diversion. The L-port ball connects adjacent port pairs only, which matches 90 degree circuit changeover with positive closure of the unused branch. For modulating temperature control neither characterizes as well as a seated plug, so choose the ball pattern for two-position changeover duty and the seated trim when the loop modulates continuously.

Do all three ports of a valve share one Cv?

No, and datasheets that list one number are incomplete. The common port path usually carries a different coefficient from each branch path, and seated trims differ between the blending and splitting directions on the same body. Size each path against its own design flow and take the worst case for actuator sizing, because the unbalance force follows the path coefficient and differential together. For blending accuracy, matched branch paths keep the mixed temperature linear in actuator signal.

What valve authority should I design to?

Authority is the valve pressure drop at design flow divided by the total circuit drop including the valve. Below about 0.25 the valve loses command over the circuit as coil and pipework drop varies with load, and control flattens at the extremes. Above about 0.5 you pay for pump head the valve burns as noise and wear. Design blending and coil bypass circuits between 0.25 and 0.5, and state the design drop per path in the RFQ so suppliers can check your number.

Why does my installed valve hunt near the closed port?

The most common cause is a blending trim installed in splitting duty. Near the seat, a flow direction that lifts the plug creates jet forces pulling it toward and away from the seat faster than the positioner can correct, and the loop cycles. Other causes are an oversized trim operating below 10 percent travel, a sticking stem from poor packing, and a worn seat passing crossport leakage. Correcting the flow direction or trim orientation ends the hunting; retuning the loop only hides it.

Is one three-way valve better than two two-way valves with pump speed control?

The circuit decides. A three-way valve keeps pump flow constant, which older chillers and coils needed for stable heat transfer and minimum flow, at the cost of pumping full flow through the bypass at part load. Two two-way valves with a variable speed drive on the pump shed that bypass energy and dominate modern designs. Retrofits with constant speed pumps, shared loop minimum flow requirements, or short piping still favor the three-way solution because it avoids re engineering the hydraulics.

Can splitting duty cavitate a three-way valve?

Yes. Splitting a high pressure stream into a low pressure branch takes the full differential across one seating port, and seated trims have moderate pressure recovery, so the vena contracta can fall below vapor pressure on liquids. Specify the maximum differential per path, ask for the manufacturer cavitation check, prefer the common port as the inlet where the trim supports it, and stage the drop with an upstream orifice or two stations when the calculation fails. Cold water with 6 bar drop is a common silent offender.

Sources

  1. Emerson: 3-way control valves catalog
  2. IMD: 3-way valve selection mixing vs diverting
  3. Baelz: tips for selecting 3-way control valves
  4. Belimo electronic valve sizing and selection (PDF)
Ask SpecForge AI